Post by amirmukaddas on Mar 12, 2024 3:17:02 GMT -6
The idea I've had lately is that the "secret of success" of links with nofollow attribute lies in the possibility that they bring (many) visits to your website directly from that of another site on the topic. Think about it for a moment: how do you think Google values referral visits to your website if the referrals are all major websites in the same industry as you? Maybe the time has come to forget about “wow, nice post” comments and focus on creating our own value on our competitors' sites. In short, if people click on the link it is not important whether there is the nofollow attribute or not, because the signal that reaches Google is still strong.
In this sense, nofollow links push, without a doubt! Nothing scientific then At this point the serious problem is to make what was written in the previous paragraph understood by those who continue Denmark Telegram Number Data to have a mechanistic vision of SEO. Google is a software so it should work by basically doing 2 + 2, instead sometimes nofollow links will produce interesting effects, other times not, just like structured data sometimes produces improvements in ranking, and sometimes not, so if you can't live with it this profession, accepting that there are no clear attributions of cause and effect , perhaps it is better to do something else, such as being a mathematics teacher in high school, a very useful profession for many reasons.
But what does Francesco say, has he gone mad? No more than Google engineers who serenely claim not to understand some mechanisms of how the engine itself works, okay? If anything, the problem lies in not being able to control all the social variables that can make the difference starting from a correctly optimized website. Talking about an authoritative brand is one thing, defining the facets of the concept of trust is a completely different thing, so I think we should all be a little less Guru (in Naples they say "knowledgeable") and a little more observant first thing about ourselves , alternatively we continue to spout sentences about what works and what doesn't, which maybe even makes for personal branding.
In this sense, nofollow links push, without a doubt! Nothing scientific then At this point the serious problem is to make what was written in the previous paragraph understood by those who continue Denmark Telegram Number Data to have a mechanistic vision of SEO. Google is a software so it should work by basically doing 2 + 2, instead sometimes nofollow links will produce interesting effects, other times not, just like structured data sometimes produces improvements in ranking, and sometimes not, so if you can't live with it this profession, accepting that there are no clear attributions of cause and effect , perhaps it is better to do something else, such as being a mathematics teacher in high school, a very useful profession for many reasons.
But what does Francesco say, has he gone mad? No more than Google engineers who serenely claim not to understand some mechanisms of how the engine itself works, okay? If anything, the problem lies in not being able to control all the social variables that can make the difference starting from a correctly optimized website. Talking about an authoritative brand is one thing, defining the facets of the concept of trust is a completely different thing, so I think we should all be a little less Guru (in Naples they say "knowledgeable") and a little more observant first thing about ourselves , alternatively we continue to spout sentences about what works and what doesn't, which maybe even makes for personal branding.